Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add filters

Language
Document Type
Year range
1.
Clinical and Applied Thrombosis-Hemostasis ; 28, 2022.
Article in English | Web of Science | ID: covidwho-2308084

ABSTRACT

Mortality rate in patients with COVID-19 increases in those admitted to the ICU. Activation of the coagulation system is associated with the worse disease outcomes. The aim of this study was to evaluate platelet activation and thrombotic biomarkers in hospitalized patients with COVID-19 during the second and third infection waves of the pandemic during 2021, following a previous report that included patients from the first wave. Sixty five patients were recruited and classified according to disease outcome;10 healthy donors were included as a control group. Among prothrombotic biomarkers, t-PA concentrations (p < .0001), PAI-1 (0.0032) and D dimer (p = .0011) were higher in patients who developed critical COVID-19. We also found platelet activation via alpha IIb beta III expression (p < .0001) and higher presence of vWF-HMWM in severe COVID-19 (p < .0001). Several prothrombotic biomarkers are found to be increased since hospital admission in patients which lately present a worse disease outcome (ICU admission/death), among these, platelet activation, vWF increased plasma concentration and presence of HMWM seem to be of special interest. New studies regarding the predictive value of thrombotic biomarkers are needed as SARS-CoV-2 variants continue to emerge.

2.
Research and Practice in Thrombosis and Haemostasis Conference ; 6(Supplement 1), 2022.
Article in English | EMBASE | ID: covidwho-2128121

ABSTRACT

Background: COVID-19 has affected millions of people worldwide over the past two years. SARS-CoV- 2 uses the Spike (S) protein to infect target cells. An active immunothrombotic state has been described in severe stages of infection. Platelets are cells implicated in the pathophysiology of CoVID-19, presumably by contributing to the release of inflammatory cytokines and exhibiting a procoagulant phenotype, although the platelet response in the disease has been studied, information on the cellular response to S protein domains is scarce. Aim(s): To study platelet reactivity response to SARS-CoV- 2 virus Spike protein and RBD domain. Method(s): Blood samples were obtained from healthy volunteers by venipuncture after signing an informed consent form, using 3.2% sodium citrate as anticoagulant. Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) was obtained by slow centrifugation (100 g x 10 minutes). PRP was separated and resuspended in Tyrodes buffer. Platelet stimulation kinetics (1X107 cells/ml) was performed with S full protein and protein S receptor binding domain (RBD) [2 mug/ml], 37degreeC. PRP was also incubated with plasma from COVID-19 patients [20 mul] for different times. Platelet activity was assessed by flow cytometry: CD41-PECy7, CD62-PE and PAC1-FITC. We used ADP 20muM, collagen 0.19 mg/ml and epinephrine 100muM as platelet activation controls. Result(s): We observed platelet reactivity after stimulation with protein S, highest activation was observed at 90 min with full protein and at 120 min with RBD domain when compared to the basal expression of selected markers and is similar to the observed with the positive control agonists. Stimulation of PRP with plasma from COVID-19 patients show the presence of activation markers at 60 min. However, activation is lower than that observed with known activation agonists. Conclusion(s): There is platelet reactivity to Spike protein, the RBD domain and with plasma from COVID-19 affected subjects.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL